The BOOKPRESS | November 1998 |
The Book of Saladin.
In the introduction to his novel,
The Book of Saladin, author and filmmaker Tariq Ali writes, "Any
fictional reconstruction of the life of a historical figure poses a problem
for the writer. Should actual historical evidence be disregarded in the
interests of a good story? I think not. In fact the more one explores the
imagined inner life of the characters, the more important it becomes to
remain loyal to historical facts and events..." This is a particularly
difficult task when exploring historical events as far removed and as disputed
as the Crusades. For Mr. Ali, this literary problematic is further complicated
by a predetermined, ideological objective. The Book of Saladin is
the second in a planned quartet of novels re-exploring various historical
conflicts between the Muslim and Christian faiths from the perspective
of the Islamic "Other."
These novels are decidedly postcolonial
in scope, exploring such historically infamous events as the destruction
of Islam in Spain, in Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree, and the reclamation
of Jerusalem after the first Crusade in The Book of Saladin. Tariq
Ali self-consciously steps into the discourse of recasting Western imperialism.
His novels explore these conflicts not as righteous Christian conquest,
but as attacks on and defenses of the empire of Islam. Thus the "imagined
inner lives" of their central characters take on allegorical import as
they are cast in the light of history. Not only do historical events become
important to the lives of the characters, they become the vehicles through
which these imagined inner lives are understood.
The Book of Saladin is the
fictional biography of the Salah al-Din (Saladin), the twelfth century
Sultan of Egypt and Syria. The biography is related through the Jewish
scholar, Isaac ibn Yakub, who the Sultan chooses as his personal scribe.
The text is a distillation of the history of the Sultan as told by himself,
his advisors, his friends, and his wives; the central events surrounding
his jihad to drive out the Franj (Crusaders) from what we now know as the
Middle East and the campaign to recapture al-Kadisiya (Jerusalem); and
the story of the scribe himself. The epic historical events of the text
are juxtaposed with Ibn Yakub’s own interpretations of history, his removed
relation, as a Jew, to Muslim governance, his personal successes and tragedies,
and his developing relationship with Salah al-Din and the various members
of his court.
As Ibn Yakub accepts his charge as
scribe, he warns that most biographies are either written by enemies or
sycophantic chroniclers. "When truth and untruth lie embracing each other
in the same bed," he observes, "it is difficult to tell them apart." The
Jewish scholar demands access and the freedom to inquire as preconditions
to writing his biography. But, in presentation, the scribe, and perhaps
Mr. Ali himself, is somewhat daunted by the supreme presence and power
of the Sultan, both as a historical figure and as a fictional character.
Ibn Yakub traces the Salah al-Din’s
early years, from his grandmother’s prophetic predictions of his rise to
power to his first entrés into the world of sex, his youthful explorations
of drinking and defiances of authority, and his rise to power in the service
of his uncle’s army. Where the Sultan’s selective accounts avoid the more
scandalous episodes of his past, Salah al-Din’s perpetual servant and advisor,
Shadhi, gladly and often humorously retells them to the faithful scribe.
Through these tales the reader arrives
at an understanding of Salah al-Din as a benevolent and wise ruler: good
to his soldiers, just in his pronouncements, simple in his tastes, and
wise in his personal, political, and military decisions, and even, in a
somewhat bizarre twist, a limited feminist. Taken at face value, Ibn Yakub’s
tale appears to present an overly simplistic picture of a powerful and
authoritative ruler. But Mr. Ali’s understanding of power and politics
in medieval Islam is more complex than the scribe’s narrative suggests.
Shadhi takes on the image of Ibn Yakub’s personal confidant, yet the Sultan
is always aware of his disclosures. Salah al-Din ensures that his scribe
is present to observe particular affairs of State, and is absent for others.
The reader becomes aware that, despite the Sultan’s promise, Ibn Yakub
is privy to only a part of the Sultan’s biography.
In these omissions, subtly and not
so subtly hinted at throughout the novel, a more complex tale arises as
a backdrop to the text and The Book of Saladin becomes a rich exploration
of the maintenance and affairs of a twelfth-century Islamic state. We learn
of the constant political balancing act between the Kadi al-Fadil, who
is the administrator of religious and political justice, and the Sultan;
the deft yet brutal control of public criticism, as seen in the execution
of a political satirist; the volatile hierarchy of power in the Middle
East; and the complex political factions which have historically divided
Islam. As Salah al-Din observes, these forces conspire to prevent a unity
to defend against Western invasions. "This permanent state of uncertainty
is the devil’s curse against the Believers. It is almost as if we are destined
never to be one against the enemy."
The Book of Saladin, however,
does not confine itself to affairs of state. Mr. Ali is particularly interested
in the sexual politics of the Sultan’s Court. "Women," as he writes, "are
a subject on which medieval history is usually silent." Consequently, The
Book of Saladin confronts the politics of prostitution, both male and
female, the alienation of the Sultan’s wives, who compete with each other
for his affection, the role of eunuchs as servants, confidants, and lovers
of the courtesans, and the sexual relations between wives. In an early
episode, the Sultan adopts Halima, a wife accused of adultery, into his
harem. Halima develops a relationship of intellectual and sexual independence
with another of Salah al-Din’s wives, Jamila. The two adopt Ibn Yakub as
their personal confidant and, through him, explore the role, or absence,
of women in the Islamic conception of paradise. "Both our Book and the
hadith are silent on the question of what will happen to us women. We can’t
be transformed into virgins. Will there be young men available to us, or
will we be left to our own company?"
Most central to the text, however,
is the role of religion in affairs of state and the ultimate clash between
Muslim and Christian worlds. In a key passage, Salah al-Din explains the
polluting force of Christianity on the Islamic faith.
It was the Franj who, over a hundred
years ago, during a siege, had roasted their prisoners on an open fire
and eaten them to assuage their hunger. The news had travelled to every
city, and a sense of shock and shame had engulfed our world. This we had
never known before. Yet only thirty years ago, the great Shirkuh had punished
one of his emirs for permitting the roasting of three Franj captives and
tasting their flesh. The ulema had soon been prevailed upon to acknowledge
the practice and denounce it as a sin against the Prophet and the hadith.
For Mr. Ali, the invasion of the
Crusaders introduces a volatile, profane element into the Middle East.
Cannibalism here becomes a metaphor for the cultural intrusions and obscene
violations of the Crusades. While their behavior both shocks and shames
the Islamic world, it also subtly changes it, forcing it to create rules
and definitions where there were previously none. This barbarism and violation
serve as the cornerstones both of Salah al-Din’s jihad and Mr. Ali’s critique
of Western religious imperialism.
This critique is more complex than
a simple binary reversal of Western colonial discourse. Mr. Ali writes
from both within and against this tradition. The Book of Saladin
accepts the Middle East as a stage on which characters who are greater
than their immediate selves rise to represent the larger whole. But while
this stage does enclose the action of the novel, disparate elements from
other lands wander on and off the stage to challenge fixed notions of religion,
both Islamic and other.
In his classic study Orientalism,
Edward Said identifies one of the central, and early, tenets of "Orientalism"
as a view of Eastern cultures as mimics of Western Christendom. "If the
mind must suddenly deal with what it takes to be a radically new form of
life—as Islam appeared to Europe in the early Middle Ages—the response
on the whole is conservative and defensive. Islam is judged to be a fraudulent
new version of some previous experience, in this case Christianity." Thus
Islam becomes a bastardized version of Catholicism and Mohammed, a pretender
to the throne.
Rather than simply relocating privilege
in Islamic thought, The Book of Saladin imagines the Middle East
as a rich patchwork of religions and ideas. In a text where Christianity,
Judaism, and Islam exist in such close proximity, Mr. Ali creates a dialogue
which, rather than assigning value, opens a discussion on the central political
relations between all religions in the Middle East. The appearance of a
heretical Templar Knight, for example, presents the opportunity for a forum
on fluidity in religious doctrine.
'Of course I have studied the
Koran, and there is much in it with which I agree, but, if I may speak
frankly, it appears to me that your religion is too close to earthly pleasures.
Because you realized that you could not live by the Book alone, you encouraged
the invention of the hadith to help you govern the Empires which
you had gained....'
'We have scholars who work on
nothing else but the hadith,' replied the Sultan quickly....
'I agree with you. They are open to many interpretations. That is why
we have the ulema to ascertain the degree of their accuracy. We need them,
Bertrand of Toulouse, we need them. Without these traditions, our religion
could not be a complete code of existence....'
'Can any religion ever become
a complete code of life when, within the ranks of the Believers, there
is such disparity in interpretation? The followers of Fatimid Caliphs,
to take the most recent example, do not share your beliefs or those of
the Caliph in Baghdad. The same applies to our religion or that of the
Jews. He who rules, makes the rules.'
Ultimately, The Book of Saladin
is the story of the reclamation of al-Kadisiya. Salah al-Din’s youth, his
political negotiations, his sexual appetite, his modest vanity: all are
intimately connected to this central event. The conquest of Jerusalem flows
backward through the text—the end of the first Crusades are the historical
events through which Mr. Ali must create the Sultan’s imagined secret life.
While the Sultan’s life is an explanation of his jihad, the jihad is also
an explanation of his life. If, at times, this dynamic leads to a somewhat
linear development, it also yields a rich, complex, and engaging picture
of medieval Islam. The Book of Saladin is a powerful retelling of
this historical conflict between East and West.
Jason Cons is a writer
and managing editor at The
Bookpress.
Tariq Ali.
Verso, 1998.
367 pages, $25.00.
Return to Front Page |